Blog Feeds
03-29 07:50 AM
2010 census data is gradually being released and it should worry anti-immigrants, particularly the Republican Party which has tried to appease the Tea Party gods by embracing a xenophobic agenda. Here's the latest, courtesy of CSM: White Americans are still the majority in the United States, but they�re rapidly being overtaken by Hispanics, according to the latest Census Bureau report, and this could have important political ramifications. During the past decade, the Hispanic population in the United States grew 43 times faster than the non-Hispanic white population, the Census Bureau reported Thursday. Put another way, between 2000 and 2010 the...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/hispanic-clout-growing.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/03/hispanic-clout-growing.html)
wallpaper 2010 Man Mohawk Hairstyle,
cgs
04-12 03:41 PM
Can someone get GC’s without reaching the priority dates?
I don’t have much information but I heard the following by mouth. My friend told me that he came to know a person(Indian) who had got his GC without the priority date being current. His prior status was EAD. If it is real, is this a fluke case?
I know many people applied for I485 in 2005 Sep, and PD was also from that year, and got the EAD’s. So do they have priority of getting GC than people who had PD dates prior to 2005 but not filed for I485?
I don’t have much information but I heard the following by mouth. My friend told me that he came to know a person(Indian) who had got his GC without the priority date being current. His prior status was EAD. If it is real, is this a fluke case?
I know many people applied for I485 in 2005 Sep, and PD was also from that year, and got the EAD’s. So do they have priority of getting GC than people who had PD dates prior to 2005 but not filed for I485?
lifestrikes
05-17 12:18 PM
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) is trying again to get the DREAM Act passed, re-introducing the measure on Wednesday to let some immigrant students in the U.S. illegally stay in the country. Durbin, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), and Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) and others will be on the bill.
Last December, after passing the House (then under Democratic control) the measure fell five votes short in the Senate and Durbin vowed to keep trying. The Durbin press conference comes a day after President Obama boosted the DREAM Act in an immigration speech in Texas, along the U.S./Mexico border where he called for various reforms.
When Durbin starts an issue, he stays with it. On Sept. 10, 2001, Durbin launched his fight to allow students of illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. at a press conference in Chicago's Pilsen neighborhood. The DREAM Act became part of a larger national debate on the hot button, divisive immigration issue.
Last December, after passing the House (then under Democratic control) the measure fell five votes short in the Senate and Durbin vowed to keep trying. The Durbin press conference comes a day after President Obama boosted the DREAM Act in an immigration speech in Texas, along the U.S./Mexico border where he called for various reforms.
When Durbin starts an issue, he stays with it. On Sept. 10, 2001, Durbin launched his fight to allow students of illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. at a press conference in Chicago's Pilsen neighborhood. The DREAM Act became part of a larger national debate on the hot button, divisive immigration issue.
2011 Black Mohawk Hair Styles
Pooja
07-06 08:16 AM
Did anyone's I-485 was approved after July 3rd?
Thanks
Thanks
more...
storm
08-11 11:46 AM
May 2007 filers, please post your processing status here:
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER
PD: JUNE 2003
I-140 FILED: OCTOBER, 2005
I-140 APPROVED: APRIL, 2006
I-485/EAD FILED: MAY 1, 2007
FP: JUNE 13, 2007
EAD APPROVED: JULY 27, 2007
EAD CARD RECEIVED: AUGUST 2, 2007
I-485 LUD'S - June 13, 2007 - after FP
Sept. 4, 2007 - soft LUD - no status change
Sept. 27, 2007 - card production ordered
Oct. 2, 2007 - approval notice sent
Oct. 4, 2007 - cards received
nashorn
12-18 03:08 PM
No, just what is asked in the RFE. Your atterney will handle it.
more...
insbaby
08-11 03:54 PM
90 days window period for H1 Stamping before the validity starts.
10 days window period to enter US (Use when it is absolutely necessary, if not, safe enter on the date it starts are after that)
10 days window period to enter US (Use when it is absolutely necessary, if not, safe enter on the date it starts are after that)
2010 Curly Mohawk Hairstyles.
helldozer
02-12 01:40 PM
Howdy all,
Does anyone know where I can find the "Program()" class used in this article...
http://www.kirupa.com/net/writingXML_pg4.htm (http://www.kirupa.com/forum/../net/writingXML_pg4.htm)
Or at least how I can write one that does the same thing.
Thanks!
Does anyone know where I can find the "Program()" class used in this article...
http://www.kirupa.com/net/writingXML_pg4.htm (http://www.kirupa.com/forum/../net/writingXML_pg4.htm)
Or at least how I can write one that does the same thing.
Thanks!
more...
Bolt
03-27 08:48 PM
Hi,
I was an employee with company A till march 2008 and i kept a H1b transfer to
company B on march 24th 2008. I was working to company B for an year
on receipt number applied for h1b transfer at USCIS. I got an RFE with
company B in sept 2008 mean while my I-94 got expired on August 2008.
Company B answered the RFE and submitted to USCIS on October 2008.
After waiting for H1B transfer to get approved it got denied on march 10th
2009.
Now i wanted to change my status from H1b to F1(CPT).My questions are
1. If i apply for transfer from H1B to F1 will i be getting New I-94 from
USCIS?
2. Should i be going back to india for getting stamped after i change my
status to F1 ?
3. Can i be on a student status from the day i receive the receipt notice
from USCIS for change of status ?
I would really appreciate your help regarding this issue..
I was an employee with company A till march 2008 and i kept a H1b transfer to
company B on march 24th 2008. I was working to company B for an year
on receipt number applied for h1b transfer at USCIS. I got an RFE with
company B in sept 2008 mean while my I-94 got expired on August 2008.
Company B answered the RFE and submitted to USCIS on October 2008.
After waiting for H1B transfer to get approved it got denied on march 10th
2009.
Now i wanted to change my status from H1b to F1(CPT).My questions are
1. If i apply for transfer from H1B to F1 will i be getting New I-94 from
USCIS?
2. Should i be going back to india for getting stamped after i change my
status to F1 ?
3. Can i be on a student status from the day i receive the receipt notice
from USCIS for change of status ?
I would really appreciate your help regarding this issue..
hair Mohawk Haircuts 2011-2012 For
nirajnp
08-06 05:09 PM
Hello everyone,
This question is for my wife. She is currently in her 5th year of H1 which expires in Oct-2011. i.e Her 5th year ends on Oct-2010. She is planning to quit her job now (Aug-2010) due to personal reasons and plans to switch to H4. Her employer (Company-A) has already filed for her GC and her LCA and I-140 is approved, but I believe they will be discontinued once she quits. So here are my questions -
1. Since she will have a little bit over 1 year remaining on her H1, can she file for H1 again if she get a new job offer?
2. Assuming that her next company (Company B), files for a GC within one year, Will there be a problem getting her H1B extended ? Since her new LCA (with Company-B) will be filed less than 365 days before her H1b expires.
3. OR Will USCIS look for the LCA filed by Company-A and grant her H1B extension?
Thanks in Advance...
This question is for my wife. She is currently in her 5th year of H1 which expires in Oct-2011. i.e Her 5th year ends on Oct-2010. She is planning to quit her job now (Aug-2010) due to personal reasons and plans to switch to H4. Her employer (Company-A) has already filed for her GC and her LCA and I-140 is approved, but I believe they will be discontinued once she quits. So here are my questions -
1. Since she will have a little bit over 1 year remaining on her H1, can she file for H1 again if she get a new job offer?
2. Assuming that her next company (Company B), files for a GC within one year, Will there be a problem getting her H1B extended ? Since her new LCA (with Company-B) will be filed less than 365 days before her H1b expires.
3. OR Will USCIS look for the LCA filed by Company-A and grant her H1B extension?
Thanks in Advance...
more...
Guy786
06-10 10:28 PM
My I-485 is pending with EB3 Feb 2006 priority date. Invoked AC21 and currently working for a different employer. Have Masters degree and 9+ years of experience.
Is there a way to re-apply for Green Card under EB2 category thru a 3rd employer and retain the old EB3 priority date?
Thanks in advance.
Is there a way to re-apply for Green Card under EB2 category thru a 3rd employer and retain the old EB3 priority date?
Thanks in advance.
hot Texture: Cropped Mohawk Trend:
Sub Zero
11-13 04:58 PM
Hi, I am looking for some small work which I can do in PHP + MySQL. I am charging very little for small work so I can raise cash for my major projects.
Things like member systems are small projects.
If you are interested, you can contact me by:
Email - mail@austers.co.uk
MSN - mail@austers.co.uk
AIM - Austers27
Thanks in advance, Sub Zero
Things like member systems are small projects.
If you are interested, you can contact me by:
Email - mail@austers.co.uk
MSN - mail@austers.co.uk
AIM - Austers27
Thanks in advance, Sub Zero
more...
house Mohawk Hairstyles For Black
kirupa
10-08 01:03 AM
Hi icube,
Unfortunately, ChangePropertyAction today doesn't allow you access attached properties. I'll add that as something we consider fixing in a future release :)
Cheers,
Kirupa
Unfortunately, ChangePropertyAction today doesn't allow you access attached properties. I'll add that as something we consider fixing in a future release :)
Cheers,
Kirupa
tattoo shaved head hairstyle.
dkempaiah
10-30 04:46 PM
Hello
Am currently on F1 - OPT status (stem OPT). Been working as a volunteer intern for past few months. Currently one of start-up company is interested in hiring me but they do not have a legal department and also not enough resources to apply for H1B. I offered to pay for my H1B fees, but they have no idea how to go about this.
Can anyone please tell how do i go about this? What kind of lawyer should i approach , what information will i need from the company, how much money does all this involve.
The other option is start working for this company , get H1 done through a consultant and transfer the H1b, again this involves legal dept which neither me nor the company has any idea. Please advise .
My OPT is valid until Dec 2011.
Thanks
Dkemp
Am currently on F1 - OPT status (stem OPT). Been working as a volunteer intern for past few months. Currently one of start-up company is interested in hiring me but they do not have a legal department and also not enough resources to apply for H1B. I offered to pay for my H1B fees, but they have no idea how to go about this.
Can anyone please tell how do i go about this? What kind of lawyer should i approach , what information will i need from the company, how much money does all this involve.
The other option is start working for this company , get H1 done through a consultant and transfer the H1b, again this involves legal dept which neither me nor the company has any idea. Please advise .
My OPT is valid until Dec 2011.
Thanks
Dkemp
more...
pictures mohawk hairstyles for 2011 2
Blog Feeds
12-03 08:50 AM
Vivek Wadhwa has a cool new proposal for a visa targeted toward entrepreneurs with great ideas and start up capital to launch new enterprises. Here's some of what he writes in Businessweek: Here's how it would work. Suppose a talented engineer who is not a U.S. citizen has a great idea for a new type of search engine and wants to start a company. This entrepreneur wants to start that company in the U.S., where venture capital markets are the most mature, intellectual property laws are strong, and the talent level is high. It turns out that the would-be founder's...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/time-for-a-founders-visa.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2009/12/time-for-a-founders-visa.html)
dresses 2011 mohawk hairstyle for
ingenix
09-12 10:04 AM
We also need to raise our voice for the Out of Status stuff.
Most of the consultants have one or more pay stub missing etc. There needs to be a amendment that more than 6 months so called out of status can also adjust their status by paying some fine or something because
1. Most of the employee are ignorant about this
2. and most employers take advantage of the situation and they are the ones who should be accountable and not the employees.
Most of the consultants have one or more pay stub missing etc. There needs to be a amendment that more than 6 months so called out of status can also adjust their status by paying some fine or something because
1. Most of the employee are ignorant about this
2. and most employers take advantage of the situation and they are the ones who should be accountable and not the employees.
more...
makeup New Short Black Haircut from
waitin_toolong
07-27 10:25 AM
the receipts etc will be sent to the address you provided in the applications and are not forwarded, to new address. stay where you are till you get the receipts.
girlfriend natural short mohawk hairstyle
Templarian
09-21 03:41 PM
:thumb:
I can has grammar now?
http://kirupa.templarian.com/smh.gif
I can has grammar now?
http://kirupa.templarian.com/smh.gif
hairstyles mohawk hairstyle for women.
gcformeornot
03-22 05:07 AM
so. But since your 140 is approved the PD is yours. You have to find new employer, start from Labor process again.
Macaca
08-05 07:42 AM
A Polarized, and Polarizing, Congress (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080301949.html) By David S. Broder (davidbroder@washpost.com), August 5, 2007
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
The distinguishing characteristic of this Congress was on vivid display the other day when the House debated a bill to expand the federal program that provides health insurance for children of the working poor.
Even when it is performing a useful service, this Congress manages to look ugly and mean-spirited. So much blood has been spilled, so much bile stockpiled on Capitol Hill, that no good deed goes untarnished.
The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) is a 10-year-old proven success. Originally a product of bipartisan consensus, passed by a Republican Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton, it was one of the last domestic achievements before Monica and impeachment fever seized control.
It is up for renewal this year and suddenly has become a bone of contention. President Bush underfunded it in his budget; the $4.8 billion extra he proposed spending in the next five years would not finance insurance even for all those who are currently being served.
But when the Senate Finance Committee proposed boosting the funding to $35 billion -- financed by a hefty hike in tobacco taxes -- Bush threatened a veto, and he raised the rhetorical stakes by claiming that the measure was a step toward "government health insurance."
That was surprising news to Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley of Iowa and Orrin Hatch of Utah, two staunch conservatives who had joined in sponsoring the Senate bill, which the Senate Finance Committee supported 17 to 4.
But rather than meet the president's unwise challenge with a strong bipartisan alternative, the House Democratic leadership decided to raise the partisan stakes even higher by bringing out a $50 billion bill that not only would expand SCHIP but would also curtail the private Medicare benefit delivery system that Bush favors.
To add insult to injury, House Democratic leaders then took a leaf from the old Republican playbook and brought the swollen bill to the floor with minimal time for debate and denied Republicans any opportunity to offer amendments.
The result was undisguised fury -- and some really ugly exchanges on the floor. The worst, given voice by former speaker Dennis Hastert, a Republican from Illinois, among others, was the charge that the Democrats were opening the program to illegal immigrants. The National Republican Congressional Committee distributed that distortion wholesale across the country in a flurry of news releases playing to the same kind of nativist prejudice that sank the immigration reform bill. In fact, governors of both parties support the certification system included in the bill for assuring that families meet citizenship requirements; the governors know that too many legal residents have been wrongly disqualified because they could not locate their birth certificates.
In the end, the House bill passed on a near-party-line vote, 225 to 204, far short of the margin that would be needed to override the promised Bush veto. That means the program will probably have to be given a temporary renewal before the Sept. 30 deadline, and eventually Democrats and the White House will negotiate an agreement.
So it will go down as one more example of unnecessary conflict. No rational human being could explain why a program that both parties support and both want to continue could ignite such a fight.
But that is Washington in this era of polarized politics. As Congress heads out for its August recess, it has accomplished about as much as is usually the case at this stage. It passed an overdue increase in the minimum wage and an overdue but healthy package of ethics reforms. It moved some routine legislation.
But what the public has seen and heard is mainly the ugly sound of partisan warfare. The Senate let a handful of dissident Republicans highjack the immigration bill. Its Democratic leadership marched up the hill and back down on repeated futile efforts to circumscribe American involvement in Iraq, then shamefully pulled back from a final vote when a constructive Republican alternative to the Bush policy was on offer.
The less-than-vital issue of the firing of eight U.S. attorneys has occupied more time and attention than the threat of a terrorist enclave in Pakistan -- or the unchecked growth of long-term debts that could sink Medicare and Social Security.
And when this Congress had an opportunity to take a relatively simple, incremental step to extend health insurance to a vulnerable group, the members managed to make a mess of it.
It's no wonder the approval ratings of Congress are so dismal.
eb3rowstuck
05-14 07:51 PM
Talked to my lawyer today. I am in EB3ROW and my PD is current as of June bulletin. Unfortunately, NSC is not processing my receipt dates yet, so I have not heard anything.
Lawyer said that there is a chance EB3ROW will retrogress in July or become "Unavailable".
Will I be back to the Retrogression line in that case or will USCIS still process? Any idea? Anyone in the same boat?
Lawyer said that there is a chance EB3ROW will retrogress in July or become "Unavailable".
Will I be back to the Retrogression line in that case or will USCIS still process? Any idea? Anyone in the same boat?
No comments:
Post a Comment